Skip to toolbar
  • Home
  • Browse All
  • Search
  • My History
  • Login
  • More
  • Contact Us
  • Using the Collections
  • How to Tag Items
  • Login
  • Register
4768

Warning. Cloning this item will not retain its parent-child relationship.

Open/Close Toolbox
    Format: Publication
    Linked To
    Publication Collection
    • Northern Institute - Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts
    Tweet this on TwitterShare this on FacebookShare this on LinkedInShare this on TumblrShare this via email
    Tools
    DownloadAdd to My CollectionContact us about thisCitation for this item
    • Library
    • Art Collection & Gallery
    • Surprise Me
    • Contact Us
    Welcome GuestLogin
    Previous: Aboriginal contributions to the evaluation of housing (and to postcolonial theory)Next: Informed consent in evaluation: informed of what, exactly?Publications

    Evaluation Methods for Vulnerable Populations: The Case for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing

    Expand/collapse
    Details
    Publication TypeJournal articleAbstractConducting research and evaluation with vulnerable populations requires deliberate and mindful adherence to ethical standards and principles such as those outlined in the Belmont report, the Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki, the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, as well as other professional standards of practice. When working with these populations, the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, in particular, must be embedded from the project outset through to the dissemination of the findings. However, operationalising these principles can pose a challenge in practice. In this paper, we will present a case study of an evaluation of a real-time captioning program for Deaf/hard of hearing students, to illustrate the implementation of an inclusive and participatory evaluation methodological framework, in which adherence to ethical standards and principles was first and foremost.AuthorCairns, K.McLaren, P.Clinton, J.Aston, R.Date2014Publication CollectionNorthern Institute - Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social ContextsVolume14/ 2014Page Number166-179CopyrightCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License.Suggested CitationCairns, K., McLaren, P., Clinton, J., & Aston, R. (2014). Evaluation Methods for Vulnerable Populations: The Case for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts [Special Issue: Evaluation], 14, 166-179. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18793/LCJ2014.14.12.ISSNISSN 1329-1440 (online)ISSN 2202-7904 (print)PublisherFaculty of Law, Education, Business and Arts CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITYPlace of PublicationDarwin
    Aston, R., Evaluation Methods for Vulnerable Populations: The Case for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (2014). Charles Darwin University, accessed 06/02/2023, https://digitalcollections.cdu.edu.au/nodes/view/4768
    Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
    Content on this site may be subject to Copyright, please contact Charles Darwin University before any reuse if you are unsure.
    RECOLLECT is Copyright © 2011-2023 by Recollect Limited | Page rendered in 0.2673 seconds

    Charles Darwin University acknowledges the traditional custodians across the lands on which we live and work, and we pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging.

    CRICOS Provider No: 00300K (NT/VIC) 03286A (NSW) RTO Provider No: 0373 TEQSA Provider ID PRV12069

    ABN 54 093 513 649 | Privacy | Copyright and Disclaimer | Cookies | Feedback